i find the research that nielsen, loranger, and company to be quite thorough. i could go on and explain what the reading talked about, but i don’t think that that would be of much assistance as everyone else in the class has read, or will soon read, most of this material. with that in mind, i decided to try to assess some of their findings based on my own admittedly skewed observations.
with about 11 years of experience on the web, and with a college degree under my belt, i have used the internet extensively. when i first got online, i used the web primarily to look up areas of interest for me, primarily video games. i used several sites at first, but found one site, gamespot, to be the best of its kind. later i became interested in sports and checked the espn website and cnnsi website along with the local newspaper sites. in highschool i was introduced to an online database, ebscohost, and later, online shopping. thus, my experience on the web runs the gamut of the kinds of things most people do on the web. so, i have a substantial diversity of information from which to draw in my own discussion of web usibility. while my own comments can in no way be considered gospel, i can say that i have seen much on the web, and have seen a great deal of development in the last 11 years or so.
the first website that i began to check religiously was gamespot. it was extremely thorough, frequently updated, easy to navigate, and archived much of its information. while recent developments have caused me to trust the site less than before, i will still periodically peruse its archive with various questions about old video games.
other than gamespot, it wasn’t until recently that i began checking other sites frequently. i attribute this two to factors: my poor (dial-up, 56k) connection, and also to those ridiculous graphics-heavy sites that were nigh-impossible to read with such a poor hook-up.
i was introduced to facebook by a friend who was not a big internet person about 3 years ago because it was so user-friendly. he explained that it was much easier to use than myspace, so i followed suit. i would shortly start a myspace page myself.
at first glance, i found the reading to be somewhat humorous, especially when it talked about the problem of when new windows are opened up without the consent of the user. it explained that many users were unable to use more than one window at once, and felt helpless or abandoned. i sort of laughed to myself, then remembered that i grew up with this thing. many very intelligent older people were not exposed to computers and the internet until relatively late in life and were hesitant to adopt it. it’s important for me to keep this in mind.
it seems that while i am a “high experience” user, there are some things about the web that i have much to learn about. i never got into blogging much (i wrote maybe 4 or 5) on myspace before i started this class. as a result, i think there are many things about the web that i should learn that will help me navigate it more effectively.